Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If X proved that $P(n)\implies Q(n)$, and if it is "likely but not proved" that $P(n)$ holds for infinitely many $n$, is it then "likely but not proved" that X established $Q(n)$ for infinitely many $n$? Consider the degenerate case $P(n)=Q(n)$. $\endgroup$ Commented 5 hours ago
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I guess there is a difference between "(X proved $P(n)$) for infinitely many $n$" and "X proved ($P(n)$ for infinitely many $n$)". $\endgroup$ Commented 5 hours ago