Timeline for answer to The most outrageous (or ridiculous) conjectures in mathematics by P. Grabowski
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8 at 9:07 | comment | added | P. Grabowski | E.g. If it is lovely, then is it also cute? There is something called cute aggression! :D | |
| Apr 8 at 9:00 | comment | added | P. Grabowski | Well, outrageous, bold, lovely, mysterious, unimaginable, magical,... words can have different aspects (dualities and more!), and I do not claim I read the meaning at the time of writing it the same way as most people would do, or I will mean the same tomorrow. :D In particular, ``outrageous'' is a strong emotion, but it might actually be positive or negative. Definitely emotional. My experience of doing some related things to this conjecture is that each time I see any different angle to that, I jump from Never! to Must be! and back quickly. I often left angry at that. xD | |
| Apr 7 at 23:35 | comment | added | Euro Vidal Sampaio | Such a shame this is Under a list of outrageous conjectures, because I think this is a lovely problem. It is also known as Grotendieck local global principle, yes? | |
| S Apr 7 at 21:37 | history | answered | P. Grabowski | CC BY-SA 4.0 | |
| S Apr 7 at 21:37 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by P. Grabowski |