Timeline for answer to Numbers with known irrationality measures? by Gerry Myerson
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2012 at 15:43 | comment | added | Kevin O'Bryant | A result of Florian Luca et al is that if the scf of $\alpha$ has exactly 2 values of partial quotients, and the indices where one of the values happens is automatic (in the sense of the Allouche & Shallit) book, then $\alpha$ is transcendental. So, for example, if you take $a_i=3$ if the binary expansion of $i$ has an even number of 1's, and $a_i=7$ otherwise, you get a provably transcendental number. | |
| Feb 27, 2012 at 15:40 | comment | added | Kevin O'Bryant | Fix an irrational $\alpha>1$, $A=\\{ \lfloor n \alpha \rfloor: n\geq 1\\}$, and let $a_i=2$ if $i\in A$ and $a_i=1$ if $i\not\in A$. The number $[a_0;a_1,a_2,\dots]$ is known to be transcendental. The idea of the proof is that if the scf of $\alpha$ is almost periodic, then there are quadratic irrationals too close to $\alpha$: by a theorem of Schmidt (analogous to Liousville's Theorem) algebraic numbers cannot be super-well-approximated by other algebraics. | |
| Feb 27, 2012 at 5:59 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | To the best of my knowledge, no. | |
| Feb 27, 2012 at 5:28 | comment | added | Noam D. Elkies | Is any explicit number with this property known to be transcendental, or to be definable by a closed form other than a continued fraction with a given sequence of bounded partial quotients (other than a quadratic irrationality, which is known to happen iff the sequence is eventually periodic)? | |
| Feb 27, 2012 at 5:22 | history | answered | Gerry Myerson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |