Timeline for answer to Are there infinite primes among powerful order terms of Dirichlet arithmetic progressions? by Erick Wong
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2012 at 5:42 | comment | added | Erick Wong | @Fernando: That is truly nice to hear! I do agree with your interpretation, and I hope you are able to make good use of this result. I'll be interested to see your paper when it is ready. | |
| Jun 15, 2012 at 16:17 | comment | added | Fernando Pimentel | Erick i am very grateful for your answer and effort of summarizing section 4 of the paper. Its converse formulation pointed me a solution to the hidden question behind my conjecture. I was looking for infinite primes of a certain quality in Dirichlet Arithmetic progressions. They did not have to come from powerful order terms. Square free order terms is just fine for shifted primes with a powerful part K. From my reading of the paper the converse formulation is proved there up to page 529. Do you confirm my interpretation? Thank you very much. I owe you an aknowledgement in a future paper. | |
| Jun 15, 2012 at 15:32 | vote | accept | Fernando Pimentel | ||
| Jun 15, 2012 at 14:51 | vote | accept | Fernando Pimentel | ||
| Jun 15, 2012 at 15:32 | |||||
| Jun 12, 2012 at 7:20 | history | edited | Erick Wong | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
small typo
|
| Jun 11, 2012 at 23:36 | history | answered | Erick Wong | CC BY-SA 3.0 |