Timeline for Why was this (4227405) suggested edit rejected?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:35 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Mar 4, 2014 at 14:46 | comment | added | user692942 | @LowerClassOverflowian Yeah, he did but I fail to see how that justifies hijacking an edit. Flag it as helpful and add your own. | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 13:58 | comment | added | Martijn Pieters | That was a later edit. | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 13:31 | vote | accept | user692942 | ||
| Mar 4, 2014 at 12:51 | comment | added | user692942 |
Ok, that makes more sense. It was purely regex so I didn't think it needed a full line code block I was just trying to emphasize the expression so thought using inline was best. It would have been nice to get some recognition rather than disappearing into a blackhole and having my edit comment hijacked.
|
|
| Mar 4, 2014 at 12:44 | comment | added | Walker | Personally, I would still say the edit was helpful | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 12:42 | history | answered | Martijn Pieters | CC BY-SA 3.0 |