Timeline for Toward a philosophy of Chat
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2019 at 21:28 | comment | added | user212646 | This is a very bad idea. I'd much rather favor that we remind people it's chat. Lighten up, and if you're offended by someone, you always have the option to flag a third party in to look at and/or leave the room until the offender has left. Just like real life. You don't have to deal or associate with people you don't like. | |
| Dec 16, 2015 at 20:31 | comment | added | Glenn Teitelbaum | not sure it was clear: a horrible room rep wouldn't boot you | |
| Dec 16, 2015 at 12:40 | comment | added | trichoplax is on Codidact now | This initially sounds great, but would give the proponents of "room culture" the tool they need to keep everyone else out of their room. This would make chat less inclusive. | |
| Dec 12, 2015 at 18:03 | comment | added | peterh | Such a system would falsely show collectively harassed people as trolls. | |
| Dec 12, 2015 at 12:45 | comment | added | Lightness Races in Orbit | Gods, can you imagine? People would be bullied out of chat in no time. | |
| Dec 11, 2015 at 19:51 | comment | added | Travis J | I like the idea of voting on messages in chat, however, chat has already been said to take too many resources and adding voting would be a massive increase in resources used and time invested. I do not think there is enough support for such a large feature like this in chat. | |
| Dec 11, 2015 at 14:51 | history | answered | Glenn Teitelbaum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |