Timeline for The MIT License – Clarity on Using Code on Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:37 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Dec 20, 2015 at 3:42 | comment | added | cfr | Note that FSF recommend not using the term 'MIT Licence' since it is ambiguous. SE are further compounding that ambiguity by creating yet another variant on top of whichever of the other MIT Licences they began with. One assumes that SE did not consult FSF on this. There are similar issues with the LPPL as you mention with GPL. Posting code here cannot provide carte blanche if it is derived from LPPL code. That makes it a derivative work and there are specific requirements which apply in that case. | |
| S Dec 19, 2015 at 21:19 | history | suggested | Deduplicator | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
shortened example of short url further
|
| Dec 19, 2015 at 20:53 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 19, 2015 at 21:19 | |||||
| Dec 17, 2015 at 1:46 | history | answered | HostileFork says dont trust SE | CC BY-SA 3.0 |