Skip to main content
Meta Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

4
  • Privacy Shield...will be almost certainly invalidated... That seems like a pretty good reason for a business to update its ToS, no? Commented May 10, 2018 at 17:54
  • 15
    @Caleb updating is one thing, adding arbitration is another. Commented May 10, 2018 at 17:55
  • 5
    Nemo, you may want to add that there is a related post on Law - law.stackexchange.com/questions/28180/… . Multiple users have already notice this clause doesn't play well with European laws and have brought this up on the older posts and in many chat rooms. Seems this point has been ignored completely and is not addressed by this update. I was planning a similar reply here, but since yours came first there is no need for dupes. Commented May 11, 2018 at 12:22
  • Actually Privacy Shield is not Alternative Dispute Resolution; in fact is works by giving Europeans the right to sue in US courts. And since it's enacted by law, it takes precedence over ADR clauses in TOS. Commented May 15, 2018 at 12:31