This update doesn't address the ethical and legal concerns for European Union users.

The claim that an arbitration was already in place is disingenuous:

We already have an arbitration-like process in place as a Privacy Shield certified company; this is an expansion of that policy that has been in place for a little over two years (well, since Safe Harbor was replaced by Privacy Shield). Privacy Shield is an ADR, like JAMS.

Privacy Shield was just a quick workaround to avoid respecting a judgement of the European Union Court of Justice and will be almost certainly invalidated, so anything based on it is not worth the paper or bits it's written on.

This update doesn't address the ethical and legal concerns for European Union users.

Apart from other aspects, the claim that an arbitration was already in place is disingenuous:

We already have an arbitration-like process in place as a Privacy Shield certified company; this is an expansion of that policy that has been in place for a little over two years (well, since Safe Harbor was replaced by Privacy Shield). Privacy Shield is an ADR, like JAMS.

Privacy Shield was just a quick workaround to avoid respecting a judgement of the European Union Court of Justice and will be almost certainly invalidated, so anything based on it is not worth the paper or bits it's written on.

This update doesn't address the ethical and legal concerns for European Union users.

The claim that an arbitration was already in place is disingenuous:

We already have an arbitration-like process in place as a Privacy Shield certified company; this is an expansion of that policy that has been in place for a little over two years (well, since Safe Harbor was replaced by Privacy Shield). Privacy Shield is an ADR, like JAMS.

Privacy Shield was just a quick workaround to avoid respecting a judgement of the European Union Court of Justice and will be almost certainly invalidated, so anything based on it is not worth the paper or bits it's written on.

This update doesn't address the ethical and legal concerns for European Union users.

The claim that an arbitration was already in place is disingenuous:

We already have an arbitration-like process in place as a Privacy Shield certified company; this is an expansion of that policy that has been in place for a little over two years (well, since Safe Harbor was replaced by Privacy Shield). Privacy Shield is an ADR, like JAMS.

Privacy Shield was just a quick workaround to avoid respecting a judgement of the European Union Court of Justice and will be almost certainly invalidated, so anything based on it is not worth the paper or bits it's written on.