Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 7, 2018 at 19:37 comment added Journeyman Geek which assumes that well, people are stupid. Which kinda runs counter to "be nice"\
Jul 7, 2018 at 19:08 comment added Marco13 OK, I wasn't aware of this "assume good intentions" part. I'd rather tackle this from the opposite direction, based on Hanlon's Razor : "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity". This is far more universally applicable.
Jul 7, 2018 at 15:46 comment added Journeyman Geek This is intentional
Jul 7, 2018 at 15:07 comment added Michael Greinecker "likely to offend" is different from "aimed at offending".
Jul 6, 2018 at 0:34 history edited Journeyman Geek CC BY-SA 4.0
added 393 characters in body
S Jul 5, 2018 at 19:40 history edited Nathan Tuggy CC BY-SA 4.0
Fixed spelling/grammar
Jul 5, 2018 at 19:30 review Suggested edits
S Jul 5, 2018 at 19:40
Jul 4, 2018 at 10:58 history edited Journeyman Geek CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Jul 4, 2018 at 10:53 comment added Journeyman Geek tbh... I'll cede that point.
Jul 4, 2018 at 10:41 comment added DavidPostill IMHO "You could Google this in 5 seconds" is not subtle.
Jul 4, 2018 at 7:56 comment added Zach Lipton I like the shield vs sword distinction. The COC is a bit of a mix: some parts are where we aspire to be the best versions of ourselves and will sometimes fall short, while others are pretty firm hard lines about conduct that won't be tolerated. That's a good thing, because we can't all always be perfect, while we all need to never be bigoted toward each other. I'd hope that people don't use the COC to conflate the two.
Jul 4, 2018 at 2:49 history edited Journeyman Geek CC BY-SA 4.0
added 556 characters in body
Jul 4, 2018 at 2:37 history edited Journeyman Geek CC BY-SA 4.0
added 76 characters in body
Jul 4, 2018 at 2:18 history edited Journeyman Geek CC BY-SA 4.0
added 823 characters in body
Jul 3, 2018 at 23:50 history answered Journeyman Geek CC BY-SA 4.0