Skip to main content
added 85 characters in body
Source Link
mattdm
  • 4.6k
  • 24
  • 35

Generating revenue from non-technology sites will enable us to dedicate more resources to meeting your needs so this is good news!

"Good news, everyone!"

I'd like to hear more about this "good news". The response from Stack Exchange staff on the Photography site (see What can Stack Exchange do to better build a photography community of practice here?) has been quite underwhelming, with a lot of glib "this will enable the community" comments and clearly no reading at all of the existing community conversations even when I provided links to them.

Are there any active plans for helping sites like Photography reach their potential? To be completely honest, this feels like an afterthought to monetization (and therefore, the claim of "good news" a little... doublespeaky).

actual "good news"?

Generating revenue from non-technology sites will enable us to dedicate more resources to meeting your needs so this is good news!

I'd like to hear more about this "good news". The response from Stack Exchange staff on the Photography site (see What can Stack Exchange do to better build a photography community of practice here?) has been quite underwhelming, with a lot of glib "this will enable the community" comments and clearly no reading at all of the existing community conversations even when I provided links to them.

Are there any active plans for helping sites like Photography reach their potential? To be completely honest, this feels like an afterthought to monetization (and therefore, the claim of "good news" a little... doublespeaky).

Generating revenue from non-technology sites will enable us to dedicate more resources to meeting your needs so this is good news!

"Good news, everyone!"

I'd like to hear more about this "good news". The response from Stack Exchange staff on the Photography site (see What can Stack Exchange do to better build a photography community of practice here?) has been quite underwhelming, with a lot of glib "this will enable the community" comments and clearly no reading at all of the existing community conversations even when I provided links to them.

Are there any active plans for helping sites like Photography reach their potential? To be completely honest, this feels like an afterthought to monetization (and therefore, the claim of "good news" a little... doublespeaky).

actual "good news"?

added 47 characters in body
Source Link
mattdm
  • 4.6k
  • 24
  • 35

Generating revenue from non-technology sites will enable us to dedicate more resources to meeting your needs so this is good news!

I'd like to hear more about this "good news""good news". The response from Stack Exchange staff on the Photography site (see What can Stack Exchange do to better build a photography community of practice here?) has been quite underwhelming, with a lot of glib "this will enable the community" comments and clearly no reading at all of the existing community conversations even when I provided links to them.

Are there any active plans for helping sites like Photography reach their potential? To be completely honest, this feels like an afterthought to monetization (and therefore, the claim of "good news" a little... doublespeaky).

Generating revenue from non-technology sites will enable us to dedicate more resources to meeting your needs so this is good news!

I'd like to hear more about this "good news". The response from Stack Exchange staff on the Photography site (see What can Stack Exchange do to better build a photography community of practice here?) has been quite underwhelming, with a lot of glib "this will enable the community" comments and clearly no reading at all of the existing community conversations even when I provided links to them.

Are there any active plans for helping sites like Photography reach their potential? To be completely honest, this feels like an afterthought to monetization (and therefore, the claim of "good news" a little... doublespeaky).

Generating revenue from non-technology sites will enable us to dedicate more resources to meeting your needs so this is good news!

I'd like to hear more about this "good news". The response from Stack Exchange staff on the Photography site (see What can Stack Exchange do to better build a photography community of practice here?) has been quite underwhelming, with a lot of glib "this will enable the community" comments and clearly no reading at all of the existing community conversations even when I provided links to them.

Are there any active plans for helping sites like Photography reach their potential? To be completely honest, this feels like an afterthought to monetization (and therefore, the claim of "good news" a little... doublespeaky).

added 229 characters in body
Source Link
mattdm
  • 4.6k
  • 24
  • 35

Generating revenue from non-technology sites will enable us to dedicate more resources to meeting your needs so this is good news!

I'd like to hear more about this "good news". The response from Stack Exchange staff on the Photography site (see What can Stack Exchange do to better build a photography community of practice here?) has been quite underwhelming, with a lot of glib "this will enable the community" comments and clearly no reading at all of the existing community conversations even when I provided links to them.

Are there any active plans for helping sites like Photography reach their potential? To be completely honest, this feels like an afterthought to monetization (and therefore, the claim of "good news" a little... doublespeaky).

Generating revenue from non-technology sites will enable us to dedicate more resources to meeting your needs so this is good news!

I'd like to hear more about this "good news". The response from Stack Exchange staff on the Photography site (see What can Stack Exchange do to better build a photography community of practice here?) has been quite underwhelming, with a lot of glib "this will enable the community" comments and clearly no reading at all of the existing community conversations even when I provided links to them.

Generating revenue from non-technology sites will enable us to dedicate more resources to meeting your needs so this is good news!

I'd like to hear more about this "good news". The response from Stack Exchange staff on the Photography site (see What can Stack Exchange do to better build a photography community of practice here?) has been quite underwhelming, with a lot of glib "this will enable the community" comments and clearly no reading at all of the existing community conversations even when I provided links to them.

Are there any active plans for helping sites like Photography reach their potential? To be completely honest, this feels like an afterthought to monetization (and therefore, the claim of "good news" a little... doublespeaky).

Source Link
mattdm
  • 4.6k
  • 24
  • 35
Loading