Timeline for answer to Post for clarifications on the updated pronouns FAQ by david
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2019 at 8:15 | comment | added | trlkly | That's the thing. They didn't follow their own rules with Monica, and refuse to go back and fix that, so why should we assume they'll follow their own rules in other situations? It seems that, if the situation gets sufficiently emotionally charged, they're willing to break their own rules. That is the shadow that all of this otherwise good change looms under. People don't trust the organization because they won't make amends, which means their apology was false. Rules exist to restrict those in authority, to prevent misuse of power. | |
| Oct 24, 2019 at 1:55 | comment | added | user625792 | Oh yeah? And has Monica been reinstated with public apologies in the same press she's been vilified in? | |
| Oct 23, 2019 at 2:25 | history | edited | david | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 207 characters in body
|
| Oct 23, 2019 at 2:21 | comment | added | david | @divibisan Thank you, I had not seen that post. | |
| Oct 23, 2019 at 2:16 | comment | added | divibisan | There is now an official policy of “No Comment”. So the answer is: No, they will not talk about you with the press. meta.stackexchange.com/a/335749/388335 | |
| Oct 23, 2019 at 2:16 | comment | added | scohe001 | This is the first item on Implementation: "1. Does this mean that I will be in trouble if I ever get someone's pronouns wrong? No. It's fine to make an honest mistake. But once you are directly informed of what someone wants, please act accordingly." | |
| Oct 23, 2019 at 2:15 | comment | added | user206222 | Then this concern is resolved already via stated policy changes. | |
| Oct 23, 2019 at 2:13 | history | answered | david | CC BY-SA 4.0 |