Skip to main content
Meta Stack Exchange

Return to Answer

deleted 5 characters in body
Source Link
Isaac Moses
Isaac Moses
  • 10.1k
  • 4
  • 31
  • 52

I would not be surprised at all if the previous statement and Stack Exchange's answer to Monica's statement on Mi Yodeya Meta were deleted as part of the terms of the agreement. Monica's statement here made two demands:

  1. Retract negative statements about her (explicitly including and linking to these two and one other that I can't see), and….
  2. Reinstate her as a moderator.

We see here that they're still not doing (2). With respect to (1) (which she made clear is the one she considers a "must"), it seems to me that deleting the statements on the SE network that Monica had asked them to retract could very well be part of SE's end of whatever agreement they now have. I wonder if they did or are going to do anything about the Register article; I hope so.

I would not be surprised at all if the previous statement and Stack Exchange's answer to Monica's statement on Mi Yodeya Meta were deleted as part of the terms of the agreement. Monica's statement here made two demands:

  1. Retract negative statements about her (explicitly including and linking to these two and one other that I can't see), and…
  2. Reinstate her as a moderator.

We see here that they're still not doing (2). With respect to (1) (which she made clear is the one she considers a "must"), it seems to me that deleting the statements on the SE network that Monica had asked them to retract could very well be part of SE's end of whatever agreement they now have. I wonder if they did or are going to do anything about the Register article; I hope so.

I would not be surprised at all if the previous statement and Stack Exchange's answer to Monica's statement on Mi Yodeya Meta were deleted as part of the terms of the agreement. Monica's statement here made two demands:

  1. Retract negative statements about her (explicitly including and linking to these two and one other that I can't see).
  2. Reinstate her as a moderator.

We see here that they're still not doing (2). With respect to (1) (which she made clear is the one she considers a "must"), it seems to me that deleting the statements on the SE network that Monica had asked them to retract could very well be part of SE's end of whatever agreement they now have. I wonder if they did or are going to do anything about the Register article; I hope so.

List formatting to break up a huge wall of text.
Source Link
edit approved Dec 24, 2019 at 19:17
Giacomo1968
edit approved Dec 24, 2019 at 19:17
Giacomo1968
  • 4.1k
  • 21
  • 32

I would not be surprised at all if the previous statement and Stack Exchange's answer to Monica's statement on Mi Yodeya Meta were deleted as part of the terms of the agreement. Monica's statement here made two demands - 1) retract negative statements about her (explicitly including and linking to these two and one other that I can't see), and 2) reinstate her as a moderator.:

  1. Retract negative statements about her (explicitly including and linking to these two and one other that I can't see), and…
  2. Reinstate her as a moderator.

We see here that they're still not doing (2). With respect to (1) (which she made clear is the one she considers a "must"), it seems to me that deleting the statements on the SE network that Monica had asked them to retract could very well be part of SE's end of whatever agreement they now have. I wonder if they did or are going to do anything about the Register article; I hope so.

I would not be surprised at all if the previous statement and Stack Exchange's answer to Monica's statement on Mi Yodeya Meta were deleted as part of the terms of the agreement. Monica's statement here made two demands - 1) retract negative statements about her (explicitly including and linking to these two and one other that I can't see), and 2) reinstate her as a moderator. We see here that they're still not doing (2). With respect to (1) (which she made clear is the one she considers a "must"), it seems to me that deleting the statements on the SE network that Monica had asked them to retract could very well be part of SE's end of whatever agreement they now have. I wonder if they did or are going to do anything about the Register article; I hope so.

I would not be surprised at all if the previous statement and Stack Exchange's answer to Monica's statement on Mi Yodeya Meta were deleted as part of the terms of the agreement. Monica's statement here made two demands:

  1. Retract negative statements about her (explicitly including and linking to these two and one other that I can't see), and…
  2. Reinstate her as a moderator.

We see here that they're still not doing (2). With respect to (1) (which she made clear is the one she considers a "must"), it seems to me that deleting the statements on the SE network that Monica had asked them to retract could very well be part of SE's end of whatever agreement they now have. I wonder if they did or are going to do anything about the Register article; I hope so.

Source Link
Isaac Moses
Isaac Moses
  • 10.1k
  • 4
  • 31
  • 52

I would not be surprised at all if the previous statement and Stack Exchange's answer to Monica's statement on Mi Yodeya Meta were deleted as part of the terms of the agreement. Monica's statement here made two demands - 1) retract negative statements about her (explicitly including and linking to these two and one other that I can't see), and 2) reinstate her as a moderator. We see here that they're still not doing (2). With respect to (1) (which she made clear is the one she considers a "must"), it seems to me that deleting the statements on the SE network that Monica had asked them to retract could very well be part of SE's end of whatever agreement they now have. I wonder if they did or are going to do anything about the Register article; I hope so.