Timeline for Firing Community Managers: Stack Exchange is not interested in cooperating with the community, is it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2020 at 7:17 | comment | added | ChatterOne | @Silicomancer There are several points, one is the fact that companies have an agenda. It doesn't matter how long you've been with the company, how good you're at your job, or how loved you are by your teammates: if you go against that agenda you're out with no second thought. Another point is that there are actions that the company knows will lead to losing (a lot of) people, but that's acceptable if it leads to the structure the company wants. Yet another one: StackExchange is a company, NOT a community, the community is a tool and treated as such. | |
| Jan 27, 2020 at 23:02 | comment | added | Cyn | I'm afraid I don't understand this story either. Was Bob the only one who kept the website going? Did he sabotage it (ethically even)? Or was Bob not involved with that outcome? | |
| Jan 26, 2020 at 18:13 | comment | added | Silicomancer | Well, call me naive, I don't get the point. Could you please explain to me, why the things happened that way? | |
| Jan 17, 2020 at 22:15 | comment | added | Richard | A colleague of my father's was made redundant by IBM three times, each time they bought out companies that resold their mainframe products. Eventually he got the hint. | |
| Jan 16, 2020 at 9:05 | comment | added | NoDataDumpNoContribution | Very interesting story. Reminds me a bit on the Weather forecast. You never know what will happen next. | |
| Jan 15, 2020 at 21:07 | history | answered | ChatterOne | CC BY-SA 4.0 |