Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

3
  • 1
    Precisely. Continuing as usual would be continuing to believe that we and SE are partners. That SE cares about the Q&A sites. It means continuing to treat company edicts as law. I am advocating exactly the opposite. If we choose to continue, we do so ignoring the company, we stop expecting them to back us up or provide us with anything at all. If we choose to stay, we do so in the full knowledge that the company running these sites is inimical to the community of users. We follow the rules we agree with and ignore those we don't. That is very much not continuing as usual. Commented Jan 18, 2020 at 15:01
  • 3
    As for your edit, yes, not contributing is also a rational choice. That's leaving the sites. I am only talking about those who wish to stay. Commented Jan 18, 2020 at 15:24
  • 2
    There are many forms of leaving and staying... I am not sure if my stance about adding new content will change... if it does and I decide to ask or answer on main sites, then I will probably act more or less the way you describe. Commented Jan 18, 2020 at 15:34