• Under "bullying and harassment", what does it mean to "invalidate" "a person's individual experiences in a manner that causes harm"? What is "harm"?

• Under "dangerous speech", what is "rhetoric that increases the risk of violence being condoned or committed against a particular group"? A discussion of crime can be construed to increase vigilantism (violence against "criminals"), even if the contributor explicitly calls for acting within the law. Never mind -- legal police work may count as "violence against criminals".

• Under "bigotry and discrimination", the list of characteristics of phrased in a way that implies exhaustiveness. Why doesn't it include sex (the most glaring omission by far), national origin, or economic background?

• Under "extremism", what is "hateful organizations"? (It's ORed with other clauses, so there's no definition of "hateful".)

• Under "hateful imagery", sex, national origin, and economic background are not listed.

• Under "mocking content", what is "in a manner that could be reasonably interpreted as causing harm"? What harm?

• Under "Political content", para. 2, sex, national origin, and economic background are once again not listed.

Under "self-harm", it is defined as "suicidal and self-injurious behaviors". It stands to reason that "harm" (sans "self-") is "murderous and injurious behaviors", which is rather hard to effect over TCP/IP.

The other, implied, definition of harm is "everything we prohibit, because things we prohibit are by definition harmful, else we wouldn't prohibit them". It's circular, exploitative, and unhelpful.

• Under "bullying and harassment", what does it mean to "invalidate" "a person's individual experiences in a manner that causes harm"? What is "harm"?

• Under "dangerous speech", what is "rhetoric that increases the risk of violence being condoned or committed against a particular group"? A discussion of crime can be construed to increase vigilantism (violence against "criminals"), even if the contributor explicitly calls for acting within the law. Never mind—legal police work may count as "violence against criminals".

• Under "bigotry and discrimination", the list of characteristics is phrased in a way that implies exhaustiveness. Why doesn't it include sex (the most glaring omission by far), national origin, or economic background?

• Under "extremism", what are "hateful organizations"? (It's ORed with other clauses, so there isn't any definition of "hateful".)

• Under "hateful imagery", sex, national origin, and economic background are not listed.

• Under "mocking content", what is "in a manner that could be reasonably interpreted as causing harm"? What harm?

• Under "Political content", para. 2, sex, national origin, and economic background are once again not listed.

Under "self-harm", it is defined as "suicidal and self-injurious behaviors". It stands to reason that "harm" (sans "self-") is "murderous and injurious behaviors", which is rather hard to effect over TCP/IP.

The other, implied, definition of harm is "everything we prohibit, because things we prohibit are by definition harmful, else we wouldn't prohibit them". It's circular, exploitative, and unhelpful.