What follows is the internal ‘gold standard’ for how we measure GPT posts on the platform.

While I'm still digesting much of the data, you seem to be failing to consider alternative explanations for it.

The actual rate at which GPT posts are made on Stack Exchange has fallen continuously since its release, and is now very small.

Or are users editing their GPT posts more nowadays rather than just copy/paste in an effort to evade detection? I've certainly seen the later, although this week, with the floodgates opened, it's much more copy/paste once again. I cannot remotely imaging that you are seeing a "very small" number of GPT posts this week, as I've spotted more than 100 myself barely looking. These are clear copy/paste

What follows is the internal ‘gold standard’ for how we measure GPT posts on the platform.

While I'm still digesting much of the data, you seem to be failing to consider alternative explanations for it.

The actual rate at which GPT posts are made on Stack Exchange has fallen continuously since its release, and is now very small.

Or are users editing their GPT posts more nowadays rather than just copy/paste in an effort to evade detection? I've certainly seen the latter, although this week, with the floodgates opened, it's much more copy/paste once again. I cannot remotely imagine that you are seeing a "very small" number of GPT posts this week, as I've spotted more than 100 myself barely looking. These are clear copy/paste