Timeline for answer to GPT on the platform: Data, actions, and outcomes by Ryan M
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2023 at 1:21 | history | edited | blackgreen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
promote comment into post
|
| Jun 8, 2023 at 15:51 | comment | added | andrewJames | I have been - and continue to be - impressed by and grateful for the clarity of thought and consistency of message coming from our volunteer S.E. moderators and community leaders (this is just one example). | |
| Jun 8, 2023 at 13:18 | comment | added | JonathanZ | Good Lord but this needs to be higher. Amid so much speculation, this is actionable. And it addresses a genuinely bad thing that's kinda hidden in all the details of the post: mods are flagging stuff as ChatGPT that reviewers think isn't ChatGPT! (Or maybe it's only those that lead to suspension? Maybe that reconciles the gap between people who have found 10,000+ GPT answers and the smaller number in this post?) Regardless, if I were a mod and I was misidentifying answers as GPT, I would want to know. | |
| Jun 8, 2023 at 5:57 | history | edited | Andy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Referring to the original post, not this posted answer
|
| Jun 8, 2023 at 5:43 | history | edited | Cody Gray | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
suggestions; modify/revert as desired
|
| Jun 8, 2023 at 5:37 | history | answered | Ryan M | CC BY-SA 4.0 |