A list of per-site meta discussion
Because I like lists (except when chatgpt makes them).
From searching is:q [discussion] created:2023-09-19.. url:meta.stackexchange.com url:393127 on stackexchange.com. In order of number of site questions. Help is welcome with keeping this up to date.
Please avoid "meta-meta-effect-ing" these meta discussions: If you don't frequent said site, and you're not going to voice something specific to that community and its specific situation, leave their discussion be and let them have their talk (I'd even include leaving their voting be, but of course, I can't force you to do anything- only ask politely).
- Ask Ubuntu: Should we not participate in the one-rep voting experiment?
- TeX - LaTeX: Do we want to volunteer to test the lowered voting privilege?
- Unix & Linux: Should U&L participate in the "1 reputation voting" change?
- Cross Validated: Do we want to volunteer for the alpha test on lowering rep requirements for voting?
- Arqade: Should Arqade opt-in to the 1 reputation voting experiment?
- Home Improvement: No low rep voting, please!
- Graphic Design: Should we volunteer to test 1-reputation voting?
- Seasoned Advice: Do we wish to be part of the 1-rep-voting test?
- Arduino: Should Arduino SE participate in the '1-rep voting' test?
- Movies & TV: Should Movies & TV SE participate in the 1 reputation voting experiment?Should Movies & TV SE participate in the 1 reputation voting experiment?
- Code Golf: Is code golf going to be opting into the voting reputation requirement test?
- Pets: We're considering helping with the 1 reputation voting trial
- Expatriates: Do we want to participate in the 1 rep voting cap experiment?
- Retrocomputing: Should we avoid the low rep voting experiment?
- GenAI: Do we want to volunteer to test the lowered voting privilege?
