Edit - Meta Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2

is it possible that the new process provides more data than what the old data provided? I suppose it possibly could be less too

user400654
– user400654

2024-02-21 02:33:06 +00:00
Commented Feb 21, 2024 at 2:33
7

I can't agree more. Really. Well said!

user152859
– user152859

2024-02-21 08:06:18 +00:00
Commented Feb 21, 2024 at 8:06
1

@KevinB It's entirely possible that there are benefits to users, yes. But usability does not appear to be one of them.

Steve Bennett
– Steve Bennett

2024-02-23 03:17:43 +00:00
Commented Feb 23, 2024 at 3:17
@KevinB The new process isn't new, it must have existed for a while already, for regulatory reasons.

Cornelius Roemer
– Cornelius Roemer

2024-02-28 22:36:19 +00:00
Commented Feb 28, 2024 at 22:36

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
indent code by 4 spaces
backtick escapes `like _so_`
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)

<https://example.com>

[example](https://example.com)

<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »