Timeline for answer to User activation: Learnings and opportunities by Ian Ringrose
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3 at 18:21 | comment | added | user400654 | @TLW that's absolutely true, however, it is not a necessary for changes to help one to always be a negative for the other. Happier "experts" can lead to better new user interactions and new users who want to become experts. but that's not what the company is focusing on. Everything is in the name of number go up at all costs, even if it means experts stepping back or leaving entirely. An expert leaving is less of a value loss to stack than a dozen new users signing up... even if those new users never do anything to produce value. | |
| Jan 23, 2025 at 15:55 | comment | added | TLW | Challenge with this: experts leave over time, and do not appear out of thin air - they graduate from new users. You do need a certain rate of new users to remain stable. The exact amount of influx remains a question. | |
| Sep 16, 2024 at 14:42 | history | edited | user152859 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Sep 16, 2024 at 12:56 | history | answered | Ian Ringrose | CC BY-SA 4.0 |