Timeline for answer to AI-generated Answers experiment on Stack Exchange sites that volunteered to participate by Adamant
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2025 at 6:33 | comment | added | Alex | The reason they feel it's okay for them to post "checked" AI generated answers while it is suspendable for users to post checked AI generated answers, is because they're trying to build an LLM specifically off the SE users. Using another AI for answers would introduce another AI's data into SE AI's, increasing the required space without adding value. That's probably also why they are concealing the source of the AI -- it's probably a partisan figure like Musk trying to absorb SE's quality into an AI he's building, and revealing his identity would discourage many quality users from editing. | |
| Feb 5, 2025 at 14:34 | comment | added | SPArcheon | pretty sure your last point is the closest to the truth. It is pretty clear that the company behind Stack Exchange (that being Prosus) think of the network as a factory of curated training content to sell. Everything points to this. From ensuring that no one can use the data dump without paying them first to exclusive agreements with specific vendors, the goal is to have the users curate the content for them so it can be sold at higher price. After all, what would go for more $$$? Unreviewed quora questions or a curated SO answer some "user resource" wasted time curating? | |
| Feb 5, 2025 at 0:05 | history | answered | Adamant | CC BY-SA 4.0 |