Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

4
  • 6
    @Starship Slate went out of their way to explain how the discussion wasn't likely to result in any changes, so I don't see the point. Also, Slate is not the Community VP. Commented Feb 11, 2025 at 13:28
  • Yes, but I would like to know if they learned anything from it Commented Feb 11, 2025 at 14:23
  • 2
    @Starship I'm not sure why you'd expect leadership to be at all aware of that discussion though. If you want to know if anything came out of it, you should ask Slate. As far as I can tell, none of it got outside a very small group of mods and Meta users. Commented Feb 11, 2025 at 15:50
  • 2
    @Starship "if they learned anything from it" Maybe that their community still doesn't understand them. And we would probably try to if only they would educate us. But their plan is only known to them so far. I tried to read the blog posts for a while but I only remember "AI is the future of community" or something similar from it and gave up. Commented Feb 13, 2025 at 22:17