Skip to main content
Meta Stack Exchange

Return to Answer

Post Timeline

continued last edit
Source Link
philipxy
philipxy
  • 2.2k
  • 3
  • 16
  • 20

Amazingly you want to take a logo that is an illustration of a STACK OVERFLOW & make it not a stack.

But that's consistent with the rest of the blog--the blogthe blog--which DOESN'T EVEN KNOW IT'S A STACK:

The once disparate stacks

THE STACK IS THE WHOLE LOGO.

representing

IT ALREADY REPRESENTS ... A STACK OVERFLOW.

P.S.

In this image riffing off the logo and incorporating text

Knowledge doesn't loop, it stacks.

text "the stack logo of elements toppling to the right first extended to a 3-D oblique view then with elements conjoined towards the axis of rotation then fanning more than 180 degrees above where the view is cut offtext "the stack logo of elements toppling to the right, first extended to a 3-D oblique view, then with elements conjoined towards the axis of rotation, then fanning more than 180 degrees above where the view is cut off

the stack elements are connectedconnect beyond the "book spine" of the new logo suggestionand wrap around into what unavoidably evokes a PADDLE WHEEL.

So IT LOOPS, and IT DOESN'T STACK.

(Or, forgiving the slab thickness, it evokes a ROLODEX--literally, looping knowledgeKNOWLEDGE LOOPING.)

Amazingly you want to take a logo that is an illustration of a STACK OVERFLOW & make it not a stack.

But that's consistent with the rest of the blog--the blog DOESN'T EVEN KNOW IT'S A STACK:

The once disparate stacks

THE STACK IS THE WHOLE LOGO.

representing

IT ALREADY REPRESENTS ... A STACK OVERFLOW.

P.S.

In this image riffing off the logo and incorporating text

Knowledge doesn't loop, it stacks.

text "the stack logo of elements toppling to the right first extended to a 3-D oblique view then with elements conjoined towards the axis of rotation then fanning more than 180 degrees above where the view is cut off

the stack elements are connected beyond the "book spine" of the new logo suggestion into what unavoidably evokes a PADDLE WHEEL.

So IT LOOPS, and IT DOESN'T STACK.

(Or, forgiving the slab thickness, a ROLODEX--literally, looping knowledge.)

Amazingly you want to take a logo that is an illustration of a STACK OVERFLOW & make it not a stack.

But that's consistent with the rest of the blog--which DOESN'T EVEN KNOW IT'S A STACK:

The once disparate stacks

THE STACK IS THE WHOLE LOGO.

representing

IT ALREADY REPRESENTS ... A STACK OVERFLOW.

P.S.

In this image riffing off the logo and incorporating text

Knowledge doesn't loop, it stacks.

text "the stack logo of elements toppling to the right, first extended to a 3-D oblique view, then with elements conjoined towards the axis of rotation, then fanning more than 180 degrees above where the view is cut off

the stack elements connect beyond the "book spine" of the new logo and wrap around into what unavoidably evokes a PADDLE WHEEL.

So IT LOOPS, and IT DOESN'T STACK.

(Or, forgiving the slab thickness, it evokes a ROLODEX--literally, KNOWLEDGE LOOPING.)

typo & extended
Source Link
philipxy
philipxy
  • 2.2k
  • 3
  • 16
  • 20

Amazingly you want to take a logo that is an illustration of a STACK OVERFLOW & make it not a stack.

But that's consistent with the rest of the blog--the blog DOESN'T EVEN KNOW IT'S A STACK:

The once disparate stacks

THE STACK IS THE WHOLE LOGO.

representing

IT ALREADY REPRESENTS ... A STACK OVERFLOW.

P.S.

In this image riffing off the logo and incorporating text

Knowledge doesn't loop, it stacks.

text "the stack logo of elements toppling to the right first extended to a 3-D oblique view then with elements conjoined towards the axis of rotation then fanning more than 180 degrees above where the view is cut off

the stack elements are connected beyond the "book spine" of the new logo suggestion into what unavoidably evokes a PADDLE WHEEL.

So IT LOOPS, and IT DOESN'T STACK.

(Or, forgiving the slab thickness, a ROLODEX--literally, looping knowledge.)

Amazingly you want to take a logo that is an illustration of a STACK OVERFLOW & make it not a stack.

But that's consistent with the rest of the blog--the blog DOESN'T EVEN KNOW IT'S A STACK:

The once disparate stacks

THE STACK IS THE WHOLE LOGO.

representing

IT ALREADY REPRESENTS ... A STACK OVERFLOW.

P.S.

In this image riffing off the logo and incorporating text

Knowledge doesn't loop, it stacks.

text "the stack logo of elements toppling to the right first extended to a 3-D oblique view then with elements conjoined towards the axis of rotation then fanning more than 180 degrees above where the view is cut off

the stack elements are connected beyond the "book spine" of the new logo suggestion into what unavoidably evokes a PADDLE WHEEL.

So IT LOOPS, and IT DOESN'T STACK.

(Or a ROLODEX--literally, looping knowledge.)

Amazingly you want to take a logo that is an illustration of a STACK OVERFLOW & make it not a stack.

But that's consistent with the rest of the blog--the blog DOESN'T EVEN KNOW IT'S A STACK:

The once disparate stacks

THE STACK IS THE WHOLE LOGO.

representing

IT ALREADY REPRESENTS ... A STACK OVERFLOW.

P.S.

In this image riffing off the logo and incorporating text

Knowledge doesn't loop, it stacks.

text "the stack logo of elements toppling to the right first extended to a 3-D oblique view then with elements conjoined towards the axis of rotation then fanning more than 180 degrees above where the view is cut off

the stack elements are connected beyond the "book spine" of the new logo suggestion into what unavoidably evokes a PADDLE WHEEL.

So IT LOOPS, and IT DOESN'T STACK.

(Or, forgiving the slab thickness, a ROLODEX--literally, looping knowledge.)

typo & extended
Source Link
philipxy
philipxy
  • 2.2k
  • 3
  • 16
  • 20

Amazingly you want to take a logo that is an illustration of a STACK OVERFLOW & make it not a stack.

But that's consistent with the rest of the blog--the blog DOESN'T EVEN KNOW IT'S A STACK:

The once disparate stacks

THE STACK IS THE WHOLE LOGO.

representing

IT ALREADY REPRESENTS ... A STACK OVERFLOW.

P.S.

In this image riffing off the logo and incorporating text

Knowledge doesn't loop, it stacks.

text "the stack logo of elements toppling to the right first extended to a 3-D oblique view then with elements conjoined towards the axis of rotation then fanning more than 180 degrees above where the view is cut off

the stack elements are connected beyond the "book spine" of the new logo suggestion into what unavoidably evokes a PADDLE WHEEL.

So IT LOOPS, and IT DOESN'T STACK.

(Or a ROLODEX--literally, looping knowledge.)

Amazingly you want to take a logo that is an illustration of a STACK OVERFLOW & make it not a stack.

But that's consistent with the rest of the blog--the blog DOESN'T EVEN KNOW IT'S A STACK:

The once disparate stacks

THE STACK IS THE WHOLE LOGO.

representing

IT ALREADY REPRESENTS ... A STACK OVERFLOW.

P.S.

In this image riffing off the logo and incorporating text

Knowledge doesn't loop it stacks.

text "the stack logo of elements toppling to the right first extended to a 3-D oblique view then with elements conjoined towards the axis of rotation then fanning more than 180 degrees above where the view is cut off

the stack elements are connected beyond the "book spine" of the new logo suggestion into what unavoidably evokes a PADDLE WHEEL.

So IT LOOPS, and IT DOESN'T STACK.

Amazingly you want to take a logo that is an illustration of a STACK OVERFLOW & make it not a stack.

But that's consistent with the rest of the blog--the blog DOESN'T EVEN KNOW IT'S A STACK:

The once disparate stacks

THE STACK IS THE WHOLE LOGO.

representing

IT ALREADY REPRESENTS ... A STACK OVERFLOW.

P.S.

In this image riffing off the logo and incorporating text

Knowledge doesn't loop, it stacks.

text "the stack logo of elements toppling to the right first extended to a 3-D oblique view then with elements conjoined towards the axis of rotation then fanning more than 180 degrees above where the view is cut off

the stack elements are connected beyond the "book spine" of the new logo suggestion into what unavoidably evokes a PADDLE WHEEL.

So IT LOOPS, and IT DOESN'T STACK.

(Or a ROLODEX--literally, looping knowledge.)

Source Link
philipxy
philipxy
  • 2.2k
  • 3
  • 16
  • 20