Timeline for answer to The CEO says we "have now changed" our reputation for over-zealous moderation. What actually changed? by Rebecca J. Stones
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12 at 12:22 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek | I confused that with another comment I made - and figured we're dragging that bit of SU drama over here. I've addressed that. I've noticed in every other case a moderator has addressed that too. | |
| Feb 12 at 12:14 | comment | added | Lundin | Anyway I don't believe the "welcome wagon" is what's referred to as all, but rather: Discussions and it's bastard offspring, chat for 1 rep users and the AI slop prompt. None which has any effect at all on friendliness. | |
| Feb 12 at 11:58 | comment | added | Lundin | I never saw any proof of the "welcome wagon" actually fixing anything. It mainly seemed to piss people off by focusing solely on people posting borderline rude comments while giving everyone who posted rude questions a free pass. Rude question as in "I can't even be arsed to read the first chapter in a programming book, I prefer to get handed fish by unpaid volunteers". Those kind of questions are what messed up the culture of site so that those who have at least done some research before asking a question get thrown under the bus as well. | |
| Feb 11 at 7:31 | history | answered | Rebecca J. Stones | CC BY-SA 4.0 |