Timeline for answer to Off topic questions have to be cleared out of the way, but NOT via closure by hyde
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 21:34 | history | migrated | from meta.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Sep 27, 2013 at 14:08 | comment | added | Peter Alfvin | Setting aside the question of whether we (SE) want to somewhere/somehow provide a "debugging/programming service", I think driving out questions we don't want in the SO repository can and should be done via rep incentives and done by focusing on others, not the question asker. This proposal, including the penalties, seems like a good one. But I sense real SO/MSO resistance to doing this, since it seems so obvious and, as far as I know, hasn't been tried before. | |
| Sep 27, 2013 at 11:51 | comment | added | Your Common Sense | I have a strong desire to throw in a penalty. Answered knowingly offtopic question that gets closed? Say good-bye to all the snatched rep and have some penalty points off your rep on top of that. | |
| Sep 27, 2013 at 11:33 | history | answered | hyde | CC BY-SA 3.0 |