Timeline for answer to Advice on failed audit by user743382
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2014 at 6:57 | comment | added | Will Ness | "exactly" not in the means, but in the goals... If everyone were acting responsibly, like you suggest, I wouldn't feel the need to propose that. But I've seen some cavalier attitudes on this issue, both in actual actions and in responses to that post of mine, like "I'm entitled to it, and I couldn't care less!". That's clearly not what you advocating. Maybe some clarification on this could be made in the FAQ or something... | |
| Sep 7, 2014 at 20:29 | comment | added | user743382 | @WillNess To be fair, that's not exactly what you suggested. Although I do agree that people shouldn't be voting if they cannot tell whether a question or answer is a good one, I also feel people should be able to make that call themselves. I know I've voted on questions and answers in the past that your suggestion says I shouldn't (be allowed to) vote on. I'd like to think I make sure I can judge the worth of a post before voting, and that plenty of others do so as well, even if you can find counterexamples. | |
| Sep 7, 2014 at 19:24 | comment | added | Will Ness | "I would have skipped the question, because I'm not familiar enough with the material to make that call." I once suggested exactly the same thing and got downvoted very heavily... | |
| Sep 5, 2014 at 11:49 | history | answered | user743382 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |