Timeline for answer to Reward for close voters finding appropriate duplicates? by Chris Sprague
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2019 at 16:18 | comment | added | peterh | I think the correct name for the bronze flag would be Deduplicator. Duplicator is the OP, the deduper is the first dupe flagger/closevoter. | |
| Nov 1, 2016 at 18:05 | comment | added | Chris Sprague | @JAL Thanks! I did not post this elsewhere. I've actually never posted in meta SE, in part because I'm concerned I might do something wrong. If you think it's a good idea, you're more than welcome to post about this there in my stead. | |
| Nov 1, 2016 at 17:57 | comment | added | JAL | Chris, did you ever post this on Meta.SE? I think it's a great idea. | |
| Dec 20, 2014 at 20:04 | comment | added | Chris Sprague | @lpapp Sure, the name and number of flags required to get each badge could be discussions of their own, these are just examples I made to get my point across. If it was unclear, credit towards badges could double-count, e.g. 1 "point" towards Clone Wars would also be counted as a point towards Deputy/Marshal. | |
| Dec 20, 2014 at 17:31 | comment | added | László Papp | I would set it in sync with other similar badges, like question edit or helpful flags, so the gold badge would be 500, not 300, but yeah, it is similar to that kind. You do not get to get reputation points for editing questions either above 2000 rep or flagging posts. The "Beside Myself" reads quite silly though. I am still unsure why duplicates would be handled so special. I am equally annoyed when people answer primarily opinion based, broad, unclear, etc, questions instead of close voting. | |
| Dec 19, 2014 at 13:45 | history | edited | Chris Sprague | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarified a sentence
|
| Dec 18, 2014 at 15:04 | history | answered | Chris Sprague | CC BY-SA 3.0 |