Skip to main content

Timeline for answer to Anything wrong with spreading links? by Ben Voigt

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

Post Revisions

7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 30, 2014 at 15:37 comment added rocket101 @BenVoigt as for the other point- point taken and will do in future. Thanks.
Dec 30, 2014 at 15:33 comment added rocket101 @BenVoigt and yet, BTC SE has the same basic rules and spirit as any other SE site, like SO - wouldn't they be familiar with the communities' principals?
Dec 30, 2014 at 15:29 comment added Ben Voigt @rocket101: Another point is that, given that it took only a couple hours to convince you the idea was terrible, you clearly went advertising your proposal way too early. Next time, get feedback from the metazens first for 12 hours or a day, then you can invite other feedback.
Dec 30, 2014 at 15:26 comment added Ben Voigt @rocket101: That 15 rep requirement is not much of a barrier, especially after association bonus is considered. Someone slightly active on BitCoin stackexchange, who has never even visited SO before, would be able to vote.
Dec 30, 2014 at 15:16 comment added rocket101 I just am confused on how it could be seen as soliciting votes - due to the 15 rep barrier to voting on meta, it seems like the only people voting on it could be people familiar with the SO community and its rules. I thought the only thing it would do would be to add breadth. Am I missing something?
Dec 29, 2014 at 10:32 comment added Artjom B. I think it depends on what audience is reached. If those are litecoin aficionados, they are likely to vote yes (if they have an account) not because the proposal is great, but because litecoins are great. In that case "Do you see anything wrong with my proposal or that could be improved?" is spot on. Otherwise, if the audience is expected to be diverse, "Check out my proposal." is already neutral enough.
Dec 29, 2014 at 5:39 history answered Ben Voigt CC BY-SA 3.0