Return to Question

A single-character edit such as this suggested edit, which actually is just adding a question-mark is annoying and adds nothing. Moreover, it gets blindly approved without improving the edit.

For reference, this is the original question: http://stackoverflow.com/revisions/30023028/1 which had the scope of improvement like:

NOTE: Reading the comments thoroughly, it seems that there might be a confusion between actually suggesting an edit versus approving the edit. Please see this original question, and then compare it with the edited question as it looks now. Please take some time to look at the edit history before making any opinion.

A single-character edit such as this suggested edit, which actually is just adding a question-mark is annoying and adds nothing. Moreover, it gets blindly approved without improving the edit.

For reference, this is the original question: https://stackoverflow.com/revisions/30023028/1 which had the scope of improvement like:

NOTE: Reading the comments thoroughly, it seems that there might be a confusion between actually suggesting an edit versus approving the edit. Please see this original question, and then compare it with the edited question as it looks now. Please take some time to look at the edit history before making any opinion.

For those who think the edit to add a question-mark to original question (How to do multiple record updation in oracle) in the posted example is correct, then please understand that it actually makes it grammatically incorrect. Please read Why do my “How to” questions often get renamed to “How do I��?

For those who think the edit to add a question-mark to original question (How to do multiple record updation in oracle) in the posted example is correct, then please understand that it actually makes it grammatically incorrect. Please read Why do my “How to” questions often get renamed to “How do I”?

The duplicate marked question, "Too minor" edits - better to leave poor quality on the site? has a highest voted answer with a conclusion:

Another question, When an edit only fixes a typo, what should I do as a reviewer? also talks about fixing a typo. As I said, my concern is not about fixing typos, or correcting spelling mistakes or grammar, but a single-character addition in the topic title and then being approved by the reviewers without improving the edit.

The duplicate marked question, "Too minor" edits - better to leave poor quality on the site? has a highest voted answer with a conclusion:

Another question, When an edit only fixes a typo, what should I do as a reviewer? also talks about fixing a typo. As I said, my concern is not about fixing typos, or correcting spelling mistakes or grammar, but a single-character addition in the topic title and then being approved by the reviewers without improving the edit.