Timeline for answer to Please don't just approve trivial suggested edits - rather improve the edit per the scope by moooeeeep
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 9:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| May 6, 2015 at 18:07 | comment | added | Lalit Kumar B | @NathanTuggy :-) | |
| May 6, 2015 at 17:37 | comment | added | Nathan Tuggy | @LalitKumarB: Since there are no suggested edits on Meta to speak of, I was referring to SO reviewers coming to read Meta, not review it. | |
| May 6, 2015 at 17:27 | comment | added | Lalit Kumar B | @NathanTuggy Nothing fancy. What I mean is, I wish we not only have good review here at Meta, but also on the rest other sites as well. | |
| May 6, 2015 at 16:19 | comment | added | Nathan Tuggy | @LalitKumarB: Not quite sure what you mean; there are presumably a fair number of near-blind reviewers on SO proper, but very few of them would be found on Meta because that's too much effort. | |
| May 6, 2015 at 10:40 | comment | added | Lalit Kumar B | @NathanTuggy Generally, I wouldn't expect them on any site. Because if they fail, then it is a poor review and poor judgement. | |
| May 5, 2015 at 17:14 | comment | added | Nathan Tuggy | @LalitKumarB: Generally, I would not expect blind approvers (of anything) to be on Meta. | |
| May 5, 2015 at 12:42 | comment | added | Lalit Kumar B | I am unable to conclude, however I find your opinion to quite close to what I think. So marking it as an answer. I see 39 upvotes and 14 downvotes. Certainly 14 users defer from my thoughts, and they think it doesn't matter for them to have a pile of questions with a single character edit in the suggested edits stack. I think they are the ones who also approve them blindly. | |
| May 5, 2015 at 12:35 | history | edited | moooeeeep | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| May 5, 2015 at 11:22 | vote | accept | Lalit Kumar B | ||
| May 5, 2015 at 10:46 | history | edited | moooeeeep | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| May 5, 2015 at 10:25 | history | undeleted | moooeeeep | ||
| May 5, 2015 at 10:25 | history | edited | moooeeeep | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 974 characters in body
|
| May 4, 2015 at 17:57 | history | deleted | moooeeeep | via Vote | |
| May 4, 2015 at 17:55 | history | answered | moooeeeep | CC BY-SA 3.0 |