Timeline for Adding details and hyperlinks in edits
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2015 at 14:04 | vote | accept | cp.engr | ||
| Oct 11, 2015 at 11:26 | comment | added | underscore_d | It helps to remember that edit reviewers are just members too, so they can make incorrect judgements just as much as post authors can. I've seen plenty of edits tagged way off base and can only assume some people are tearing through the review queue blindly choosing options. | |
| Oct 11, 2015 at 9:57 | answer | added | PM 2Ring | timeline score: 8 | |
| Oct 11, 2015 at 8:12 | comment | added | Spikatrix | Looks like a good edit. I've edited it in. | |
| Oct 11, 2015 at 6:40 | answer | added | user4151918 | timeline score: 16 | |
| Oct 11, 2015 at 3:58 | history | edited | cp.engr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Edited title like Mateen Ulhaq's rev 3, but to better reflect my intent. I think the C99 is more important than the link.
|
| Oct 11, 2015 at 3:55 | history | rollback | cp.engr |
Rollback to Revision 2
|
|
| Oct 11, 2015 at 3:51 | history | edited | Mateen Ulhaq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
More descriptive/searchable title.
|
| Oct 11, 2015 at 3:50 | comment | added | Mateen Ulhaq | Looking at the edit itself, I personally think it should have been approved. | |
| Oct 11, 2015 at 2:33 | history | edited | cp.engr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
just noticed that the voting wasn't unanimous
|
| Oct 11, 2015 at 2:26 | history | asked | cp.engr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |