Skip to main content
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

I have suggested this editthis edit. After submitting it, I noticed that the first word in the title wasn't capitalized, so I did a ninja edit to fix that – which counts as the same edit, if I understand correctly.

The edit was then rejected by Community ("conflicted with subsequent edit"), but was applied anyway, and I can't see another edit on the post.

Did my ninja edit conflict with my first edit?

I've seen a similar question, but that was for a case where a reviewer chose "reject and improve".

Edited to add: I guess I'm wondering why it looks like the question never looked any different from what it does now, but it did: code was not formatted, for example.

I have suggested this edit. After submitting it, I noticed that the first word in the title wasn't capitalized, so I did a ninja edit to fix that – which counts as the same edit, if I understand correctly.

The edit was then rejected by Community ("conflicted with subsequent edit"), but was applied anyway, and I can't see another edit on the post.

Did my ninja edit conflict with my first edit?

I've seen a similar question, but that was for a case where a reviewer chose "reject and improve".

Edited to add: I guess I'm wondering why it looks like the question never looked any different from what it does now, but it did: code was not formatted, for example.

I have suggested this edit. After submitting it, I noticed that the first word in the title wasn't capitalized, so I did a ninja edit to fix that – which counts as the same edit, if I understand correctly.

The edit was then rejected by Community ("conflicted with subsequent edit"), but was applied anyway, and I can't see another edit on the post.

Did my ninja edit conflict with my first edit?

I've seen a similar question, but that was for a case where a reviewer chose "reject and improve".

Edited to add: I guess I'm wondering why it looks like the question never looked any different from what it does now, but it did: code was not formatted, for example.

replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
Source Link

I have suggested this edit. After submitting it, I noticed that the first word in the title wasn't capitalized, so I did a ninja edit to fix that – which counts as the same edit, if I understand correctly.

The edit was then rejected by Community ("conflicted with subsequent edit"), but was applied anyway, and I can't see another edit on the post.

Did my ninja edit conflict with my first edit?

I've seen a similar questionsimilar question, but that was for a case where a reviewer chose "reject and improve".

Edited to add: I guess I'm wondering why it looks like the question never looked any different from what it does now, but it did: code was not formatted, for example.

I have suggested this edit. After submitting it, I noticed that the first word in the title wasn't capitalized, so I did a ninja edit to fix that – which counts as the same edit, if I understand correctly.

The edit was then rejected by Community ("conflicted with subsequent edit"), but was applied anyway, and I can't see another edit on the post.

Did my ninja edit conflict with my first edit?

I've seen a similar question, but that was for a case where a reviewer chose "reject and improve".

Edited to add: I guess I'm wondering why it looks like the question never looked any different from what it does now, but it did: code was not formatted, for example.

I have suggested this edit. After submitting it, I noticed that the first word in the title wasn't capitalized, so I did a ninja edit to fix that – which counts as the same edit, if I understand correctly.

The edit was then rejected by Community ("conflicted with subsequent edit"), but was applied anyway, and I can't see another edit on the post.

Did my ninja edit conflict with my first edit?

I've seen a similar question, but that was for a case where a reviewer chose "reject and improve".

Edited to add: I guess I'm wondering why it looks like the question never looked any different from what it does now, but it did: code was not formatted, for example.

Add paragraph about no changes visible
Source Link
Benjamin W.
  • 54.3k
  • 2
  • 16
  • 20

I have suggested this edit. After submitting it, I noticed that the first word in the title wasn't capitalized, so I did a ninja edit to fix that – which counts as the same edit, if I understand correctly.

The edit was then rejected by Community ("conflicted with subsequent edit"), but was applied anyway, and I can't see another edit on the post.

Did my ninja edit conflict with my first edit?

I've seen a similar question, but that was for a case where a reviewer chose "reject and improve".

Edited to add: I guess I'm wondering why it looks like the question never looked any different from what it does now, but it did: code was not formatted, for example.

I have suggested this edit. After submitting it, I noticed that the first word in the title wasn't capitalized, so I did a ninja edit to fix that – which counts as the same edit, if I understand correctly.

The edit was then rejected by Community ("conflicted with subsequent edit"), but was applied anyway, and I can't see another edit on the post.

Did my ninja edit conflict with my first edit?

I've seen a similar question, but that was for a case where a reviewer chose "reject and improve".

I have suggested this edit. After submitting it, I noticed that the first word in the title wasn't capitalized, so I did a ninja edit to fix that – which counts as the same edit, if I understand correctly.

The edit was then rejected by Community ("conflicted with subsequent edit"), but was applied anyway, and I can't see another edit on the post.

Did my ninja edit conflict with my first edit?

I've seen a similar question, but that was for a case where a reviewer chose "reject and improve".

Edited to add: I guess I'm wondering why it looks like the question never looked any different from what it does now, but it did: code was not formatted, for example.

Source Link
Benjamin W.
  • 54.3k
  • 2
  • 16
  • 20
Loading