Timeline for Created new tag and started tagging, found existing tag, now what?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2021 at 12:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://blog.stackoverflow.com with https://blog.stackoverflow.com
|
|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 9:15 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackoverflow.com/ with https://meta.stackoverflow.com/
|
|
| Jul 30, 2016 at 9:17 | history | edited | Madara's GhostMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 20, 2016 at 13:59 | vote | accept | Benjamin W. | ||
| Jun 20, 2016 at 13:48 | comment | added | Cody Gray Mod | Yes. Either because it takes an indefinite period of time for the community to do it on their own, or it is impossible for the community to do it on their own. Of course, this Meta-based approach is not perfect, either. Diamond mods don't exactly troll the [tag-synonyms] tag looking for work to do, and it's hard to ascertain exactly when community consensus has been reached. But you've got the general idea. | |
| Jun 20, 2016 at 13:26 | comment | added | Benjamin W. | @CodyGray So the point of posting an explicit merge/synonymize request on MSO is to see how the community feels about it so a diamond mod can then go ahead and do it? | |
| Jun 20, 2016 at 5:44 | comment | added | Cody Gray Mod | In response to your update, it is not currently possible for a regular user to suggest or vote on synonyms. One of the many and long-ignored problems with tag synonyms. But a diamond moderator can do this now, with a single click. | |
| Jun 19, 2016 at 23:26 | history | edited | Benjamin W. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Add update
|
| Jun 19, 2016 at 11:36 | answer | added | Spc_555 | timeline score: 35 | |
| Jun 18, 2016 at 23:09 | comment | added | Benjamin W. | @Braiam Yes, the question is not stellar, but others are alright. I think Bash on Windows is special due to (non-)interaction with Windows applications, though... are you implying both tags are unneccessary? | |
| Jun 18, 2016 at 23:03 | comment | added | Braiam | Baah, the question itself is off topic. And if MS and Canonical did it right, bash on windows will behave the same way as bash in non-windows systems, like all portable programs should. | |
| Jun 18, 2016 at 22:50 | history | asked | Benjamin W. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |