Timeline for Documentation is read-only. What’s next? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
28 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2018 at 10:16 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| May 23, 2018 at 10:51 | |||||
| Dec 16, 2017 at 17:41 | history | closed |
Robert Columbia Code Lღver Michael Gaskill Stephen RauchMod Toto |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Dec 16, 2017 at 16:35 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 16, 2017 at 17:41 | |||||
| Nov 18, 2017 at 15:14 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 18, 2017 at 16:16 | |||||
| Oct 29, 2017 at 4:57 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 29, 2017 at 6:37 | |||||
| Sep 8, 2017 at 21:05 | comment | added | Jon Ericson StaffMod | @NathanOliver: Excellent question. From a practical point of view, it seems unreasonable to include 27-some names and profile links (much less 70). From a C.Y.A., linking to the archive is sufficient. I'd just do my best to pick out the top contributors using whatever method makes sense to you (and early authors seem a reasonable choice) and using a trusty et al. to cover the rest. I wish this had an easy solution. :-( | |
| Sep 8, 2017 at 19:17 | comment | added | NathanOliver | I have a question regarding consider linking to the top few major contributors. How do we determine who the top contibutors are? Consider this example, which people should we explicitly cite? Should we just go by date and take to top few since they were the first and thus laid the foundation? | |
| Sep 8, 2017 at 18:11 | history | edited | Jon EricsonStaffMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 7, 2017 at 23:15 | answer | added | Adam | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 31, 2017 at 13:26 | comment | added | Matt | Why do you remove the content? An archive accessible via browser would be much better. For me, a JSON archive is useless. | |
| Aug 28, 2017 at 21:30 | comment | added | NH. | @NathanOliver if it is a JSON, can't we just link to the dump and then provide the index that you need to get to the relevant part (object["ID here"]["other ID here"])? | |
| Aug 21, 2017 at 1:15 | answer | added | Jonathan Leffler | timeline score: 13 | |
| Aug 19, 2017 at 15:05 | comment | added | ReinstateMonica3167040 | Why not use Community to replace Docs links with Wayback Machine links? | |
| Aug 18, 2017 at 18:07 | answer | added | Adam | timeline score: 18 | |
| Aug 18, 2017 at 14:04 | comment | added | Ian Ringrose | Why not a link to the wayback machine as attribution? At a first step, you could even auto converts all links to documentation into wayback machine links before putting the posts in the spacal review queue. | |
| Aug 17, 2017 at 12:01 | answer | added | Lucas Trzesniewski | timeline score: 8 | |
| Aug 16, 2017 at 13:29 | comment | added | Caleb Kleveter | @Panda Thank you for suggesting that (I have a reason for a great appreciation). | |
| Aug 16, 2017 at 2:48 | comment | added | Panda | I'd just like to express my thanks to the Docs team for implementing my suggestion regarding Docs badges, really glad to hear that! | |
| Aug 15, 2017 at 20:40 | comment | added | Will Ness | (contd.) there's also a problem with TOC pages which get chopped into several pages, when there are many topics. each such page gets its own URL and must be saved separately. One long page with all the topics in one screen would be nice to have. without the TOC pages the topics will be inaccessible. | |
| Aug 15, 2017 at 20:38 | comment | added | Jon Ericson StaffMod | @WillNess: Yes, scripting that rather than doing it by hand is the way to go. I'm trying out the Ruby I learned participating on Docs, but it doesn't have to be me. | |
| Aug 15, 2017 at 20:34 | comment | added | Will Ness | @JonEricson that's good to hear. maybe you could just push them all somehow programmatically (not just the missing - even those that are present may be severely outdated). Doing it by hand sucks, there's big delays and trying to save more than a few at once usually results in "no available servers to handle request" error. one thing though. it seems some JS is served from your servers for each page as well. If you stop doing that, it might prevent pages from loading? (I don't understand much about these things). | |
| Aug 15, 2017 at 20:24 | comment | added | Jon Ericson StaffMod | @WillNess: We don't have any plans to mess with the Wayback Machine. On the contrary, I've been looking to submit pages that are currently missing there. | |
| Aug 15, 2017 at 20:16 | comment | added | Will Ness | will web.archive.org links to docs still work after you remove the docs from your servers? please don't do anything that would break it, if possible. | |
| Aug 15, 2017 at 20:08 | answer | added | Nicol Bolas | timeline score: 57 | |
| Aug 15, 2017 at 19:35 | comment | added | NathanOliver | Bummer. Well, if you have to you have to. As long as there is a title or id or something easily identifiable it shouldn't be to hard to do a find on it. | |
| Aug 15, 2017 at 19:32 | comment | added | Jon Ericson StaffMod | @NathanOliver: We're still working out how the archive will work, but it's looking like you'll have to link to the entire data dump. :-( | |
| Aug 15, 2017 at 19:30 | comment | added | NathanOliver | Will you be able to link to the part of the dump you copied from or will it be a link to the entire dump? | |
| Aug 15, 2017 at 18:37 | history | asked | Jon EricsonStaffMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |