Timeline for answer to Could we earn reputation for useful flags / janitorial votes? by Alexei Levenkov
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2019 at 22:57 | history | edited | Alexei Levenkov | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jun 27, 2019 at 22:56 | comment | added | Alexei Levenkov | @PeterMortensen "at the current level" (Really appreciate your edits!) | |
| Jun 27, 2019 at 22:26 | comment | added | Peter Mortensen | What do yo mean by "if closing stays a current level"?. Do you mean "if closing stays at the current level"? | |
| Jun 27, 2019 at 22:25 | history | edited | Peter Mortensen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Active reading [<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/long-standing#Adjective>].
|
| Jun 27, 2019 at 21:27 | comment | added | Alexei Levenkov | @weegee - if only we would be able to automatically decide what flags are junk... So far any flag requires non-trivial effort of one or more people. See excellent point from Servy's answer - " it's in having qualified capable reviewers to evaluate that content and see if action is in fact merited"... | |
| Jun 27, 2019 at 21:23 | comment | added | weegee | @Zoe what if we deduct some rep for junk flags? Like very little rep. That will allow the flags to carry some weight | |
| Jun 27, 2019 at 21:13 | comment | added | Zoe - Save the data dump | One other problem that could arise is close vote rings that close for an instance questions on low-visibility tags. They could close everything, regardless of quality, just for the rep. The abuse potential here is far too big compared to the advantages. | |
| Jun 27, 2019 at 21:00 | history | answered | Alexei Levenkov | CC BY-SA 4.0 |