Timeline for answer to Feature test: Thank you reaction by rene
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2020 at 16:12 | comment | added | M-- | Thanks rene. I kinda want to downvote this to emphasize on the importance of downvotes :) | |
| Jun 20, 2020 at 14:35 | history | edited | Peter Mortensen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Active reading [<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/downvote#Noun> <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/downvote#Verb>].
|
| Jun 19, 2020 at 13:59 | comment | added | einpoklum | I oppose the "thanks" feature, but if a person is discouraged from down-voting upon noticing many "thanks", then - that person is rethinking their position. That's not a bad thing in itself. So -1 on this answer. | |
| Jun 18, 2020 at 13:19 | comment | added | Jean-François Fabre Mod | And it was rightfully ignored so far. But fair enough. Personally I'd prefer more useful features like ... more winter hats. | |
| Jun 18, 2020 at 11:21 | comment | added | PM 2Ring | @Jean-FrançoisFabre We were given advanced notice on this new feature 6 months ago, see meta.stackexchange.com/q/339283/334566 | |
| Jun 18, 2020 at 8:36 | comment | added | RobertS supports Monica Cellio | The analysis is wrong regarding another point: It's not the percentage of "thanks" or "Thank you" comments, it's the percentage of comments with "thank" in it which were counted for the statistic. That's a big big difference and is not appropriate. Comments with "thank" in it can indeed have a sense. Only the comments which have the purpose to say "Thank you" should be counted. I explained that in my answer as Critical Addendum as well. | |
| Jun 18, 2020 at 7:31 | comment | added | philipxy | @Spevacus Thank you for those lovely thanks. | |
| Jun 17, 2020 at 21:58 | comment | added | Cody Gray Mod | I was surprised way more than you, @TemaniAfif. No, we were not consulted in any way. | |
| Jun 17, 2020 at 21:37 | comment | added | Jean-François Fabre Mod | we got notified an hour before that post came up, and we definitively weren't consulted. | |
| Jun 17, 2020 at 21:30 | comment | added | Temani Afif | @Jean-FrançoisFabre out of curiosity: are moderators notified internally before a feature is implemented/released? or they are surprised like us? | |
| Jun 17, 2020 at 20:45 | comment | added | Adrian Mole | @Jean-FrançoisFabre Something to relieve the otherwise uneventful lives of our Moderators: You can now go out looking for Thanking Rings. | |
| Jun 17, 2020 at 20:42 | comment | added | zx8754 | We need a "a brave voter" badge. | |
| Jun 17, 2020 at 20:16 | comment | added | Proud anti-zionist | @cs95 That would render it completely useless, since at that reputation level, you can cast upvotes. | |
| Jun 17, 2020 at 20:11 | comment | added | coldspeed95 | They could solve the problem of "why this and not that" by making reactions exclusively available to only <15 rep and anons. But one thing you're on point, this needs more investigation (it's pretty half-baked atm). | |
| Jun 17, 2020 at 20:04 | history | answered | rene | CC BY-SA 4.0 |