Return to Answer

On top of that, you have the temerity to post this to /r/programming, a subreddit where every and all "discussion" about Stack Overflow inevitably results in nothing more than thousands of comments by idiots complaining that their questions were closed by "moderators" for allegedly arbitrary reasons (thus said idiots very obviously don't understand how SO works either). Which means the overwhelming traffic to this question will be from people who have an incentive to agree with you, and thus upvote this question. In effect, you've artificially inflated its score in order to create the impression of support for your lack of new ideas - that's politician-level dishonesty right there.

On top of that, you have the temerity to post this to /r/programming, a subreddit where every and all "discussion" about Stack Overflow inevitably results in nothing more than thousands of comments by folks complaining that their questions were closed by "moderators" for allegedly arbitrary reasons (thus said folks very obviously don't understand how SO works either). Which means the overwhelming traffic to this question will be from people who have an incentive to agree with you, and thus upvote this question. In effect, you've artificially inflated its score in order to create the impression of support for your lack of new ideas - that's politician-level dishonesty right there.

On top of that, you have the temerity to post this to /r/programming, a subreddit where every and all "discussion" about Stack Overflow inevitably results in nothing more than thousands of comments by folks complaining that their questions were closed by "moderators" for allegedly arbitrary reasons (thus said folks very obviously don't understand how SO works either). Which means the overwhelming traffic to this question will be from people who have an incentive to agree with you, and thus upvote this question. In effect, you've artificially inflated its score in order to create the impression of support for your lack of new ideas - that's politician-level dishonesty right there.

On top of that, you have the temerity to post this to /r/programming, a subreddit where every and all "discussion" about Stack Overflow inevitably results in nothing more than thousands of comments by idiots complaining that their questions were closed by "moderators" for allegedly arbitrary reasons (thus said idiots very obviously don't understand how SO works either). Which means the overwhelming traffic to this question will be from people who have an incentive to agree with you, and thus upvote this question. In effect, you've artificially inflated its score in order to create the impression of support for your lack of new ideas - that's politician-level dishonesty right there.

On top of that, you have the temerity to post this to /r/programming, a subreddit where every and all "discussion" about Stack Overflow inevitably results in nothing more than thousands of comments by idiots complaining that their questions were closed by "moderators" for allegedly arbitrary reasons (thus said idiots very obviously don't understand how SO works either). Which means the overwhelming traffic to this question will be from people who have an incentive to agree with you, and thus upvote this question. In effect, you've artificially inflated its score in order to create the impression of support for your lack of new ideas - that's politician-level dishonesty right there.

On top of that, you have the temerity to post this to /r/programming, a subreddit where every and all "discussion" about Stack Overflow inevitably results in nothing more than thousands of comments by folks complaining that their questions were closed by "moderators" for allegedly arbitrary reasons (thus said folks very obviously don't understand how SO works either). Which means the overwhelming traffic to this question will be from people who have an incentive to agree with you, and thus upvote this question. In effect, you've artificially inflated its score in order to create the impression of support for your lack of new ideas - that's politician-level dishonesty right there.