Timeline for Why was my question about Unix APIs closed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2024 at 21:23 | history | edited | M-- | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
'Stack Overflow' is the legal name.
|
| Oct 25, 2024 at 11:25 | vote | accept | Brendan | ||
| Oct 21, 2024 at 3:11 | comment | added | Stephen C | "Not sure how to best "resolve" this question now". You can delete it if you want to. The question will be deleted automatically anyway if it remains closed with no answers. So there's no need to "resolve" it. OTOH ... if you still want an answer, you should EDIT the question to address Mayken's concerns. (And Karl's) Basically, the question is not answerable in its current form. | |
| Oct 21, 2024 at 1:44 | answer | added | Karl Knechtel | timeline score: 6 | |
| Oct 20, 2024 at 18:11 | comment | added | Security Hound | A question can be out of scope and not be “stupid”. | |
| Oct 20, 2024 at 18:05 | comment | added | francescalus | It's all moot now, but the reason I asked about [4] is because the on-topic logic is "(1 or 2 or 3) and (4)" not "1 or 2 or (3a and 3b)". I'm not saying you're wrong (and I wouldnt vote to close for that reason) to think it meets 4/3b, but you took care to address part, but not all, of that final criterion. Still, like I say, it's moot now the close reason has been corrected. | |
| Oct 20, 2024 at 17:55 | comment | added | Brendan | (BTW - "Which, for a reason I don't understand you appear to have lumped in with [3] rather than as [4] where it belongs" - that was just because it's an "and". I should have labeled those parts 3a and 3b. As for why it's unique to software development... not sure, is there any other context than software development where you need to know the relationship between these operations?). | |
| Oct 20, 2024 at 17:54 | comment | added | Brendan | Thanks Makyen, that's much more helpful than "off topic" :) Not sure how to best "resolve" this question now, but the problem I wanted to discuss here is now solved! (as for the original question, I'll get back to that when I have more time). | |
| Oct 20, 2024 at 15:57 | history | edited | yivi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 35 characters in body
|
| Oct 20, 2024 at 15:55 | comment | added | Makyen Mod | I've reopened the question and re-closed it as "needs details or clarity (unclear)". I've also left a couple of comments stating what additional information I believe the question requires. | |
| Oct 20, 2024 at 15:55 | history | edited | yivi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 19 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Oct 20, 2024 at 15:49 | history | edited | yivi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 19 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Oct 20, 2024 at 15:48 | comment | added | francescalus | Can you address the "unique to software development" requirement? (Which, for a reason I don't understand you appear to have lumped in with [3] rather than as [4] where it belongs.) In any case, the question now closed as "need[ing] details or clarity", rather than being "hopelessly" off-topic. | |
| Oct 20, 2024 at 15:23 | history | asked | Brendan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |