Timeline for answer to A discussion about closed (and potentially useful) posts on Stack Overflow by NoDataDumpNoContribution
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2025 at 20:26 | comment | added | NoDataDumpNoContribution | @Wicket I always thought it's both. If useful is somehow not the right word, I mostly argue in this answer about letting everything live, but in different and somewhat separated places. Let Q&A be Q&A, let discussions be discussions and chat be chat. I have in principle nothing against the three or maybe four lanes that seem to be the vision of the company as indicated in the Ask Me Anything in March. | |
| Apr 17, 2025 at 18:24 | comment | added | Wicket | The perception of what is useful varies significantly depending on whether we view SO as a long-lasting knowledge base or as a place to get help. | |
| Apr 17, 2025 at 8:22 | history | edited | NoDataDumpNoContribution | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 273 characters in body
|
| Apr 17, 2025 at 8:11 | history | answered | NoDataDumpNoContribution | CC BY-SA 4.0 |