Timeline for answer to Articles experiment and survey by Dalija Prasnikar
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2025 at 19:29 | comment | added | Ash Zade Staff | @starball good point re: reusing Discussions. We are first validating the type of content and then looking at how we would implement it. My bias is for reusing existing infrastructure where it makes sense. | |
| May 4, 2025 at 10:35 | history | edited | Dalija PrasnikarMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Grammar fixes
|
| May 3, 2025 at 8:22 | history | edited | Dalija PrasnikarMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Grammar fixes
|
| May 2, 2025 at 21:35 | comment | added | starball Mod | Could this not be done with Discussions? makes me think of my two "self-answered discussions" there: stackoverflow.com/q/77979031/11107541, stackoverflow.com/q/78046082/11107541 | |
| May 2, 2025 at 12:01 | comment | added | Dalija Prasnikar Mod | @GertArnold Yes, reputation threshold sounds fine. Although 30K is a bit too much. I still don't have that much and I published 4 books. I can definitely write stuff ;) | |
| May 2, 2025 at 9:08 | comment | added | Gimby | @GertArnold agreed. You kind of want to avoid the tutorial effect. In my experience, many tutorials are written by people who know how it works for only 5 minutes themselves and wanted to enthusiastically share it with the world while kind of forgetting that the world needs production-quality information and not enthusiasm-driven information. | |
| May 2, 2025 at 8:25 | comment | added | Gert Arnold | I think there should be a reputation threshold. I remember Shog9's answer here. | |
| May 1, 2025 at 20:06 | history | answered | Dalija PrasnikarMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |