Return to Answer

No, I don't believe they should. The review queue doesn't really make it clear that these aren't traditional Q&A posts either, which is causing people to then raise "Not an answer" flags against the "answer" (because, for example, they looks like comments), which then likely results in it going to the low quality review queue and it enters the mod queues as well; neither of which is desirable.

At the moment, my opinion is that the posts shouldn't be included in any of the curation tools that exist, and they have no curation workflow; there's no closure or migration options. Not an answer flags only really count if the post is entirely off-topic. Of course spam and R&A flags are applicable. If curation of these posts is needed (it is), then that should be its own workflows (or at least should be with the current iteration, as they don't fit the current ones).

No, I don't believe they should. The review queue doesn't really make it clear that these aren't traditional Q&A posts either, which is causing people to then raise "Not an answer" flags against the "answer" (because, for example, they look like comments), which then likely results in it going to the low quality review queue and it enters the mod queues as well; neither of which is desirable.

At the moment, my opinion is that the posts shouldn't be included in any of the curation tools that exist, and they have no curation workflow; there's no closure or migration options. Not an answer flags only really count if the post is entirely off-topic. Of course spam and R&A flags are applicable. If curation of these posts is needed (it is), then that should be its own workflows (or at least should be with the current iteration, as they don't fit the current ones).

No, the review queues should not include opinion-based questions & answers.

  The review queue doesn't really make it clear that these aren't traditional Q&A posts either, which is causing people to then raise "Not an answer" flags against the "answer" (because, for example, they looks like comments), which then likely results in it going to the low quality review queue and it enters the mod queues as well; neither of which is desirable.

The posts shouldn't be included in any of the curation tools that exist, and they have no curation workflow; there's no closure or migration options. Not an answer flags only really count if the post is entirely off-topic. Of course spam and R&A flags are applicable. If curation of these posts is needed (it is), then that should have its own workflow (or at least should with the current iteration, as it don't fit the current ones).

No, I don't believe they should. The review queue doesn't really make it clear that these aren't traditional Q&A posts either, which is causing people to then raise "Not an answer" flags against the "answer" (because, for example, they looks like comments), which then likely results in it going to the low quality review queue and it enters the mod queues as well; neither of which is desirable.

At the moment, my opinion is that the posts shouldn't be included in any of the curation tools that exist, and they have no curation workflow; there's no closure or migration options. Not an answer flags only really count if the post is entirely off-topic. Of course spam and R&A flags are applicable. If curation of these posts is needed (it is), then that should be its own workflows (or at least should be with the current iteration, as they don't fit the current ones).

No, I don't believe they should. The review queue doesn't really make it clear that these aren't traditional Q&A posts either, which is causing people to then raise "Not an answer" flags against the "answer" (because, for example, they looks like comments), which then likely results in it going to the low quality review queue and it enters the mod queues as well; neither of which is desirable.

At the moment, my opinion is that the posts shouldn't be included in any of the curation tools that exist, and they have no curation workflow; there's no closure or migration options. Not an answer flags only really count if the post is entirely off-topic. Of course spam and R&A flags are applicable. If curation of these posts is needed (it is), then that should be its own workflows (or at least should be with the current iteration, as they don't fit the current ones).

No, the review queues should not include opinion-based questions & answers. 

The review queue doesn't really make it clear that these aren't traditional Q&A posts either, which is causing people to then raise "Not an answer" flags against the "answer" (because, for example, they looks like comments), which then likely results in it going to the low quality review queue and it enters the mod queues as well; neither of which is desirable.

The posts shouldn't be included in any of the curation tools that exist, and they have no curation workflow; there's no closure or migration options. Not an answer flags only really count if the post is entirely off-topic. Of course spam and R&A flags are applicable. If curation of these posts is needed (it is), then that should have its own workflow (or at least should with the current iteration, as it don't fit the current ones).