Timeline for answer to New site design and philosophy for Stack Overflow: Starting February 24, 2026 at beta.stackoverflow.com by President James K. Polk
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21 at 2:19 | comment | added | Security Hound | I don’t either. The system the code runs on is in a secure room and the language is niche, so documentation and knowledge is tough to find when you don’t know how to accomplish what your attempting to do (but have a general idea). I have had mixed results, but when it was important, it has failed nearly every time. Anyways I agree with your answer | |
| Feb 21 at 2:14 | comment | added | President James K. Polk | @SecurityHound: I don't do 'vibe coding', and I don't expect to type in a problem statement and get a finished program. I expect to read the code I get, and to test and debug it, just like I always have. I expect these products to make me more productive, and I'm confident they have significantly done that. But I can't prove it. | |
| Feb 21 at 0:58 | comment | added | Security Hound | I have spent over 40 hours with the best and latest models to solve a problem that is fairly simple but extremely “pain in the rear” to write code for, I am still trying to get the LLM, to generate something that is actually correct. I probably would have spent half the time, to write it myself, but I am not convinced of the quality of the LLMs today based on my experience. Using tools like Warp helped my document the problem set but I am not confident in the quality of the documents based on the fact it cannot write the working code. | |
| Feb 20 at 19:21 | history | answered | President James K. Polk | CC BY-SA 4.0 |