Skip to main content
22 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 27 at 18:46 comment added Dalmarus StaffMod @Starship Can't promise anything at the moment, but it's definitely being discussed.
Feb 27 at 18:18 comment added Starship @Dalmarus Okay, thank you. Also, any plans to bring in non-CMs?
Feb 27 at 14:40 comment added Dalmarus StaffMod @Starship Chances are high, though I can't promise anything at the moment. If we do, we'll give more notice than 15 minutes (the first one) or a day (like these two were) so folks have more time to plan.
Feb 26 at 21:54 comment added Starship I was not able to make these ones. Do you plan to do any more?
Feb 26 at 21:38 answer added Daniel Black timeline score: 8
Feb 26 at 19:59 comment added Dalmarus StaffMod @Sayse I like the suggestion, thank you. No promises we'll go that route (we don't for the moderator CM Office Hours), but we'll definitely discuss it.
Feb 26 at 17:31 comment added Sayse @T3H40 - Thanks, I missed that, albeit its own room would still be better imo
Feb 26 at 17:25 history edited DalmarusStaffMod CC BY-SA 4.0
It's late, but fixed the time conversion error in the title.
Feb 26 at 16:32 comment added T3 H40 @sayse Just saying, that the apples conversation was started by the office hours start announcement itself: "[...]talk about [...]your favorite fruit" I don't see many messages trickle over from previous conversations if any.
Feb 26 at 15:29 comment added Sayse Can I suggest if you were continue these sessions you create your own room for them? the first 13 minutes of the session earlier was people continuing their conversations about apples and potatoes (or something?). Reddit's AMA posts would be a good example where questions could be primed ahead of the session too
Feb 26 at 10:20 comment added pilchard 'Some folks may be past the point of wanting to talk. That's okay.' This sums up companies general tactic — ignore feedback until the user base simply keeps using whatever new trash is rolled out, or leave the site.
Feb 26 at 10:01 comment added Sayse This almost feels like you're trying to bait peaceful protestors into saying something that would invalidate the efforts
Feb 26 at 8:01 comment added Lundin As I already tried to explain, one of the countless problems the company is having is that you keep asking for feedback, over and over and over and over again. And then ignore it. We had it with speaking with various middle managers. If I want to speak with a polite person who can't do jack to change anything, I can go speak with an AI. Or the wall.
Feb 26 at 2:52 comment added Dalmarus StaffMod I can see folks feeling that way, that it's all the same. If you do, the main difference then would be a live, real-time conversation instead of posting in threads. You're welcome to join.
Feb 25 at 22:33 comment added philipxy Re "rudeness", ironically coincidentally stumbled over researching UX aspects of the SO redesign: M3 Expressive: Design with emotion Build more usable and engaging products with emotion-driven UX. M3 Expressive adds vibrant colors, intuitive motion, adaptive components, flexible typography, and contrasting shapes.
Feb 25 at 22:20 answer added MisterMiyagi timeline score: 14
Feb 25 at 22:17 comment added MisterMiyagi "This isn't about requesting feedback from you all (which has been given often, so thank you!). This is about being here to listen to whatever you're concerned about on the site." Wait, what's the difference?
Feb 25 at 22:07 comment added philipxy What is the point of this? How is giving concerns not giving feedback? We can & do already communicate concerns in questions & comments. In the chat hour you somewhat suspended the CoC. Is this how you see the chat hours as different? How is allowing rudeness supposed to help?
Feb 25 at 22:04 history became hot meta post
Feb 25 at 21:24 history edited DalmarusStaffMod CC BY-SA 4.0
restructured the first sentence for clarity
Feb 25 at 21:14 answer added Starship timeline score: 25
Feb 25 at 21:03 history asked DalmarusStaffMod CC BY-SA 4.0