Timeline for answer to Do you agree with Gergely that "Stack Overflow is almost dead"? by Shmiel
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18 at 19:57 | comment | added | Shmiel | @NoDataDumpNoContribution the issue is even bigger. Microsoft Docs is created with AI. No human is testing any new technology everything is AI generated. The issue is without humans, AI is nothing. We need AI but we need humans to train it. When I ask anything on Microsoft learn, it gives me an AI generated answer and if I don't accept it, my question gets removed because it violates the code of conduct. Don't believe me? Try it yourself | |
| Mar 18 at 18:40 | comment | added | NoDataDumpNoContribution | @Lundin "When the bubble pops and regulations catch up to AI-mania.." So in 6-8 years at the earliest, maybe never. It's a very bleak outlook. I don't know what good to do in the time until then. | |
| Mar 17 at 8:01 | comment | added | Lundin | The AI companies have kind of moved across the Internet like a swarm of grasshoppers, leaving nothing but unedible slop behind. And now there's no more food for the grasshoppers, because they have been shitting where they were eating. Tough luck but at least they created an AI bubble. When the bubble pops and regulations catch up to AI-mania, who knows, maybe the Internet can be saved. | |
| Mar 16 at 23:46 | comment | added | NoDataDumpNoContribution | I fully agree with the last paragraph, only I don't know how to solve the problem so that everyone is happy. As a content creator I want my work to be seen by humans, not by machines only. And I want it to be credited. Both seems impossible. Therefore it's either game over for knowledge generation or something has to give. Maybe AI companies want to pay. They have so much money currently. We will see. | |
| Mar 16 at 17:24 | history | answered | Shmiel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |