Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackSuper_User/status/304808452616757248
added comparison data from DBA.SE
Source Link

and tags both refer to the same application: SQL Server Management Studio. As a result there's no need to keep both tags around.

While 21 questions in each here doesn't give either tag priority, checking other SE sites shows:

Stack overflow has 940 for favor of and ~200 for specific versions; and 219 for .

Serverfault has 114 for , 18 for , and 20 for ; however only has a tag wiki entry. doesn't exist at all as a tag there.

DBA.SE has 118 questions for and none for any other variants.

and tags both refer to the same application: SQL Server Management Studio. As a result there's no need to keep both tags around.

While 21 questions in each here doesn't give either tag priority, checking other SE sites shows:

Stack overflow has 940 for favor of and ~200 for specific versions; and 219 for .

Serverfault has 114 for , 18 for , and 20 for ; however only has a tag wiki entry. doesn't exist at all as a tag there.

and tags both refer to the same application: SQL Server Management Studio. As a result there's no need to keep both tags around.

While 21 questions in each here doesn't give either tag priority, checking other SE sites shows:

Stack overflow has 940 for favor of and ~200 for specific versions; and 219 for .

Serverfault has 114 for , 18 for , and 20 for ; however only has a tag wiki entry. doesn't exist at all as a tag there.

DBA.SE has 118 questions for and none for any other variants.

Added tag markup
Source Link
Oliver Salzburg Mod
  • 89.5k
  • 2
  • 50
  • 84

The ssms and sql-management-studio tags both refer to the same application: SQL Server Management Studio. As a result there's no need to keep both tags around.

While 21 questions in each here doesn't give either tag priority, checking other SE sites shows:

Stack overflow has 940 for favor of SSMS and ~200 for specific versions; and 219 for sql-management-studio.

Serverfault has 114 for msql-ssms, 18 for ssms, and 20 for ssms-2008;; however only ssms has a tag wiki entry. sql-management-studio doesn't exist at all as a tag there.

The ssms and sql-management-studio tags both refer to the same application: SQL Server Management Studio. As a result there's no need to keep both tags around.

While 21 questions in each here doesn't give either tag priority, checking other SE sites shows:

Stack overflow has 940 for favor of SSMS and ~200 for specific versions; and 219 for sql-management-studio.

Serverfault has 114 for msql-ssms, 18 for ssms, and 20 for ssms-2008; however only ssms has a tag wiki entry. sql-management-studio doesn't exist at all as a tag there.

and tags both refer to the same application: SQL Server Management Studio. As a result there's no need to keep both tags around.

While 21 questions in each here doesn't give either tag priority, checking other SE sites shows:

Stack overflow has 940 for favor of and ~200 for specific versions; and 219 for .

Serverfault has 114 for , 18 for , and 20 for ; however only has a tag wiki entry. doesn't exist at all as a tag there.

added 295 characters in body
Source Link

The ssms and sql-management-studio tags both refer to the same application: SQL Server Management Studio. As a result there's no need to keep both tags around. With

While 21 questions in each it's not obvious whichhere doesn't give either tag should be keptpriority, checking other SE sites shows:

Stack overflow has 940 for favor of SSMS and which should go away~200 for specific versions; and 219 for sql-management-studio.

Serverfault has 114 for msql-ssms, 18 for ssms, and 20 for ssms-2008; however only ssms has a tag wiki entry. sql-management-studio doesn't exist at all as a tag there.

The ssms and sql-management-studio tags both refer to the same application: SQL Server Management Studio. As a result there's no need to keep both tags around. With 21 questions in each it's not obvious which tag should be kept and which should go away.

The ssms and sql-management-studio tags both refer to the same application: SQL Server Management Studio. As a result there's no need to keep both tags around.

While 21 questions in each here doesn't give either tag priority, checking other SE sites shows:

Stack overflow has 940 for favor of SSMS and ~200 for specific versions; and 219 for sql-management-studio.

Serverfault has 114 for msql-ssms, 18 for ssms, and 20 for ssms-2008; however only ssms has a tag wiki entry. sql-management-studio doesn't exist at all as a tag there.

Source Link
Loading