Timeline for answer to When *not* to create a SVI for a L2 VLAN? by Daniel Dib
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2013 at 18:29 | comment | added | Ricky | Translation: it takes up tcam/fib/idb/etc space that could be used for other desirable functions. | |
| May 22, 2013 at 9:07 | comment | added | Daniel Dib | Sorry, what I meant was that I don't think it's best practice to create a SVI but I don't see any harm in doing it either. Edited my answer. | |
| May 22, 2013 at 9:06 | history | edited | Daniel Dib | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected a sentence
|
| May 22, 2013 at 9:03 | comment | added | generalnetworkerror | It's a requirement to not have the SVI with an IP. That would create a routing table entry and really mess with routing with the load-balancer. I understand the counters only increment when not hardware switched. | |
| May 22, 2013 at 8:59 | history | answered | Daniel Dib | CC BY-SA 3.0 |