Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • This is the best answer IMO, because it correctly answers the question about the third clause. Without a license, copyright law (at least in the US - I'm not familiar with copyright law elsewhere in the world) says that users who receive the software have no rights. A software license adds rights. Because the GPL does not say that users can use the authors' names to endorse or promote a product, they do not have that right. The BSD License merely makes that explicit.
    – user3068
    Commented Dec 8, 2017 at 14:08
  • 3
    As I said, requirement three "isn't an additional requirement on users, just a reminder that they may not do it anyway".
    – MadHatter
    Commented Dec 8, 2017 at 14:47