Timeline for Should "meaning", as we experience it, be considered qualia?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2014 at 21:47 | answer | added | Cosmin Visan | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 5, 2014 at 18:57 | answer | added | senderle | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 5, 2014 at 10:24 | answer | added | Di Ana | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 18, 2014 at 21:32 | vote | accept | Gush | ||
| Mar 16, 2014 at 11:43 | answer | added | user5172 | timeline score: 6 | |
| Mar 16, 2014 at 7:32 | comment | added | infatuated | My answer to your title question is yes. But as for your explanation, are you saying that we may have a different sense of things we experience as qualia? For example, although we all use common color concepts (red, blue, etc) but we may sense/experience them differently as qualias? | |
| Mar 13, 2014 at 7:37 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhilosophy/status/444014416376631296 | ||
| Mar 12, 2014 at 23:56 | comment | added | Rex Kerr | I am not sure what meaning is, yet. I feel I know various different things. For example "fish" has a meaning in English; it is a lexical symbol used to refer to a certain subset of aquatic vertebrates, or to the act of trying to catch them, or the generalization of said act. Is that sense the sense that you mean? Or do you mean a sense of meaningfulness, like "raising children is really meaningful; playing video games is not"? Or something else? | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 14:22 | answer | added | Mozibur Ullah | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 14:16 | answer | added | Asphir Dom | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 13:33 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 12, 2014 at 23:41 | |||||
| Mar 12, 2014 at 13:16 | history | asked | Gush | CC BY-SA 3.0 |