Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

3
  • "supports the metaphysical claim that the mind is psychological in nature", not very clear... we have the brain, the physical (and chemical) part, the mind, the process/functions (abstract) of the brain. Where is "the psychological"? It is related to psyche, that seems to be on the mind side. I suppose that there is no tertium... Commented 15 hours ago
  • @MauroALLEGRANZA it's tertiums all the way down. (I prefer nasturtiums.) Too much flowery prose! Commented 15 hours ago
  • 1
    @MauroALLEGRANZA Salve! I would argue, like others, there are three things, indeed! For me: tria sunt: ​​corpus, mens, et computatio. So, instead of appealing to immanence or the transcendental, we appeal to the computational. Sed nemo sum, ergo omnia cum grano salis accipite! Commented 13 hours ago